A question for Saab - who makes the decision on bidders?

| 6 Comments

As an enthusiast with a interest in the future of Saab Automobile, here's a question I'd like to find out the answer to:

Who makes the decision relating to a successful bidder for control of Saab?

Saab management have been handling the hospitality, meeting interested parties at the front door, shaking hands and pouring the wine.

But how much say will they have in who gets to pull their strings in the future?

GM employed Deutche Bank to co-ordinate the mission, but then it's GM's company to sell.

So you have a Saab with a significant vested interest in the outcome, Deutsche Bank with a paid commission to achieve, and GM with an asset to sell.

Who get to make the decision and do the others get much of a say?

------

I know we've got some experienced M&A types in the readership here. Perhaps you can enlighten us as to how this process works?

My guess is that Deutsche Bank appraise the applicants, weeding out those who aren't likely to even have the slightest chance. They probably do some evaluation on the actual bids once they come in.

What I'd like some assurance about is whether or not the people that really matter - Saab's management - get to have a say in who their next owners will be.

Somehow, despite how much I hope this is the car, I fear it's not.




6 Comments

http://www.expressen.se/motor/1.1563705/gm-vill-att-saab-ska-ga-i-konkurs

well the final decision must be in GM hands it is their company. A link in Swedish about that GM maybe want to close Saab.

Mainly for two reseasons: The 9-5 is to good!?! Opel Insigna won award as the best car, but in testing the 9-5 have been better...
The second reason is the dislike from Fritz.


There is also the extra dimension about the legal process in Sweden and the loans from the EIB that I think a buyer would want the Swedish state to guarantee. I think Saab management - through their connections with Swedish politicians - will have a lot to say about it all.


I agree with ctm - those EIB loan guarantees are critical. Plus, I don't think GM wants to turn Saab-sale into an international incident. I suspect what is happening with Opel MAY impact the final decision with Saab.

It would seem that Saab's entry into Swedish re-organization forces GM to include Saab at the decision table. On the other hand, GM has to include GM "shareholder value" into the final decision. Fiduciary responsibility to shareholders forced the Bancrofts who owned majority of the Wall Street Journal (Dow Jones) to sell to Rupert Murdoch, though Murdoch had to make public promises on preserving WSJ's editorial independence.

If GM is forced into bankruptcy before Saab deal is announced, I guess the UAW might be the decider if they own 55% of GM.

My head hurts over this.


I was hoping Karen would share her thoughts. Seems she has been around such things and knows the ropes. Complicated.

Agree there are several parties involved who need to approve else a sale could be tough. Not the traditional players either. I hope management have a seat at the table for they get to work with the buyer after closing - I support who they want and hope the SWE government will too.

I also hope the who the buyer is won't make things more difficult for the company and the brand to recover. That would be a shame.



As long as Saab is in formal reconstruction, the court of Vänersborg decides, basically on the advice of Leo Guyfalk which represent Saab and is expected (but not required) get approval from GM. GM can veto his result, which effectivly forces GM to choose between bankruptcy and paying all debts. (Also remember that the court staff most likely have lots of friends and relative that works for Saab.) If GM pays off all creditors, including the state, effectively buying out Saab from the reconstruction, (something that seems highly unlikely) it can regain full control and do whatever it sees fit. If Saab files for bankruptcy (chapter 7 equivalent) GM loses all control and is only entitled to whatever money the sale of Saab, as a whole or in part, brings in, as full control is handed over to the lawyer that handles the bankruptcy. This lawyer has, by law, to some extent weight in if a sale to a specific party is good or bad for (the swedish) society.

I would say that GM's or GME's possibility to direct the sale to a specific buyer is dimishing all the time. The only thing they can realistically do is veto a few of them as long as there is some remaining buyer that can match their bid.


I think Swade should make the decision.


Leave a comment

Revvvvvvenue

Google Search

Google Links

Recent Comments

  • none: I think Swade should make the decision. read more
  • Mailr: As long as Saab is in formal reconstruction, the court read more
  • none: I was hoping Karen would share her thoughts. Seems she read more
  • Karen: I agree with ctm - those EIB loan guarantees are read more
  • ctm: There is also the extra dimension about the legal process read more
  • Tobias : http://www.expressen.se/motor/1.1563705/gm-vill-att-saab-ska-ga-i-konkurs well the final decision must be in GM hands read more

Recent Assets

  • Spyker Logo
  • Final Saab 9-5 produced
  • Final Saab 9-5 produced
  • Saab Support Convoy - Luxembourg
  • Saab Support Convoy - Luxembourg
  • Saab Support Convoy - Luxembourg
  • Saab Support Convoy - Luxembourg
  • Saab Support Convoy - Luxembourg
  • Victor Muller receives his SSC plate
  • Renault model

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Swade published on May 10, 2009 8:09 PM.

Saab NG900 prototype? was the previous entry in this blog.

The 2010 Saab 9-5 is so good that Henderson doesn't want to let it go. is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.