Whilst touring around in Sweden last month I called in on the guys at Maptun, who are sponsors of this site.
Whilst I was there, they thought I'd enjoy a taste of one of their more extreme tuning jobs. So they got a customer to bring in his tuned Saab 9-3 Aero Coupe, which is running on ethanol and producing around 480+ horsepower!!!
The car has a 2.3 engine in it rather than the standard 2-litre that was normally found in the Aeros and it's been worked over pretty heavily in the power department, though the suspension is yet to be fully sorted.
Yes, we did break the speed limit a little, but only in the name of research and only when safe to do so.
FYI, here's a sample of some of the speed intervals this car has achieved:
- 80-120 = 2.41 seconds
- 100-150 = 3.07 seconds
- 110-160 = 3.31 seconds
- 100-180 = 6.60 seconds
- 100-200 = 8.64 seconds
It certainly was fun. Tuned Saabs can be so incredibly addictive. Just use them wisely, OK?

Fun stuff. Yes, the braking seemed as fun as the acceleration!
630 Newton meters???
This is f***ing TWICE as much as my car has...
Incredible.
Let's hope Koeningsegg has the guts to make finally make a RWD Saab!
That in-gear acceleration makes my 2.0T look like a horse and buggy. WOW!!
I may be oldschool but I love that shape. The best Saab profile ever in my view. Love the sound of that engine too BTW. What gearbox/diff are they using? Dare I suggest stock?
Amazingly, he's also using the stock steering rack clamp and brace. You should have seen the fight between him and the steering wheel under boost.
It was an amazing ride. At low speeds, the car is as docile as a puppy but when you sink the slipper, it absolutely roared.
Couple of questions:
what sort of outputs have they got from the usual 2.0 in the Aero?
What mods were made to the 2.3?
And great to see they took care about the brakes, too. I once met a guy with a Porsche Turbo who had the problem that several times other cars ran into him because they tried to keep up and when it came to breaking they didn't make it. That Saab might have the same problem...