A 97% consensus about anything… That sounds more like an election in a banana republic than science. *shrug*
kabutar: So, what would it take to disprove the link between man-made CO2 emissions and climate change..?
Predictions are made for a distant future (when, conveniently, most of us will be old farts or dead for […]
kabutar, read my reply again. My point is that they start out with most/all the papers on climate change, and _then_ they discard those that does not express an opinion. _That_ is the subset (and a rather small […]
kabutar: Last time I looked at a meta-study, they considered thousands of research papers (as you state), and then they picked out those who stated an opinion. And (again as you state) indeed a large portion of […]
About 139 voters did not even respond to the second question. Perhaps their answer to the first poll matches the question in the headline?
In addition, the phrasing of the second question is perhaps a tad weak? […]
As the politicians tighten the screws, more question arise as to the consequences. (see http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/12/30/britains_costliest_mistake_stern_defends_climate_maths/ for an interesting take on […]
- Load More